Case Summary: Parker v British Airways Board (1982)
Facts:In Parker v British Airways Board (1982), David Parker, the plaintiff, found a gold bracelet on the floor of the British Airways Executive Lounge at Heathrow Airport. He handed the bracelet to a British Airways employee, asking that it be returned to him if the true owner was not found. However, British Airways sold the bracelet after failing to locate the owner and did not notify Parker. Parker subsequently sued for the bracelet or its value, claiming that as the finder, he had a right to it over British Airways.
Issue:The issue was whether Parker, as the finder of the bracelet, had a superior claim to it compared to British Airways, the occupier of the lounge where the bracelet was found.
Held:The Court of Appeal held in favor of Parker, determining that his rights as the finder were superior to those of British Airways. Since British Airways had not shown an intention to control items found on its premises, Parker, as the finder, was entitled to retain the bracelet unless and until the true owner was found.
Legal Principles:
Rights of Finders: The finder of an object generally has a right to possess it against everyone except the true owner or anyone with a stronger prior claim. Control and Intent of the Occupier: To claim superior rights over a found item, the occupier (British Airways) must demonstrate a clear intention to exercise control over the premises and anything found within it. British Airways had not provided adequate evidence of such an intention. Duty to Take Reasonable Care: Although the finder has a right to possession, they are required to take reasonable steps to locate the original owner.Significance:Parker v British Airways Board is a leading case in English property law on the rights of finders versus occupiers. It established that an occupier must demonstrate a clear intention to control lost items within its premises to assert superior rights. This principle has implications for property and commercial law, as it outlines that simply owning or occupying a location does not automatically give a stronger claim to lost property within it without an expressed intention to exercise control.
FE-1 Made Simple
Welcome to FE-1 Made Simple, the ultimate podcast powered by AI hosts to help you conquer the FE-1 exams! Join our intelligent hosts as they dive deep into complex legal topics, offering clear explanations and expert analysis across all FE-1 subjects—from EU law and constitutional law to contract and criminal law. Each episode breaks down key concepts, case law, and exam strategies, making even the most challenging material easy to grasp. Whether you're studying on the go or revising for your exams, FE-1 Made Simple is your virtual study partner, helping you master the law and succeed in your
Waar kun je luisteren?
